Archive for the ‘Knowledge’ Category

Are you ready for a KO?

Tuesday, September 9th, 2008

By Mark P. Damgelo

www.Innovative-Relevance.com

Taking a break from the GSE “conservatorship” discussion, let’s have our heads up and eyes forward.  The signs are all around us that more than the weekend’s action will have an impact on our operations – if we just look for them.  Last week it was revealed that Dell Computer’s once superior and efficient competitive distinction – their consumer- motivated JIT assembly lines and factories — were being sold off driven by new market realities.  This once seemingly unrivaled, “advanced,” collaborative supply chain and product integration approach has succumbed to a greater and evolving global market force – orchestration.  “So what?” you may ask, “Why should I care?”  How can I leverage that today for profit?

The implication urgency lies in a market lesson learned that has problematical cross-industry implications for our daily operations.  You see, the FS (financial services) and mortgage industries are more implicitly orchestrated than we realize.  Whereas manufacturers deal with raw materials, distribution, and delivery, FS and mortgage organizations orchestrate ”instruments,” packaging, and segmentation of often intangible products and services surrounding a physical object (e.g., real estate).  For our industries, we create, embellish, link, manage, and orchestrate knowledge in many forms and at aggregated and discrete levels – origination, servicing, compliance, securitization, valuations, and even repository management to name but a few.

More precisely, we often unknowingly act and internalize Knowledge Orchestration (KO) in its many forms depending upon our client base, our corporate mission, and the market’s acceptance of our current offerings.  An illustrative, decomposition example of what typically encompasses KO is presented below.

Knowledge Orchestration

Whereas the preceding graphic is complex and beyond the discussion parameters in this setting, the take away is that our operations are implicitly involved in KO in its numerous structures – similar to what Dell and other manufacturers are practicing.  Knowledge Orchestration moves beyond the convenient and siloed discussions within the drawing and shifts the reality into a comprehensive or holistic approach.  Whereas, the practice of Knowledge Orchestration is often practiced in piecemeal segments, its foundational reality can no longer be ignored as a passing management ideal or fancy — at this point, a few decades of proof should are ample enough. 

So if the world is moving into proactive Knowledge Orchestration, is this why we are seeing extensive investments and M&A’s by service-driven operations snapping up product vendors?  Is it merely cheap valuations, failed pure-play models, or is there something else?  Is this why offshore outsourcing investments are being put up for sale?  If you are evaluating high-value domestic sourcing in the American Midwest, is this not more about KO than traditional outsourcing?

As our organizations select vendors, conduct outsourcing endeavors, and rebalance the supply chain to meet a rapid unfolding marketplace, visionary leaders recognize the underlying and permanent shifts that are transpiring – they are starting to act with their models, new personnel, and expanded relationships.  The critical components needed for sustainable success must be met with new techniques and methods that are designed for the “flat world” or more importantly the fourth iteration of globalization and the innovation it demands.

So with the markets still projected to realize another $500 billion in write-offs – approaching $1.3 trillion in total — KO looks forward to what the customers, secondary markets, executives, and investors are demanding both ST and LT.  Outsourcers, servicers, specialty operations (compliance, fraud, et al), and product firms often fail to realize the missing pieces within KO and they don’t often believe that others are inherently needed for their lasting success.  If you doubt this subtle conclusion, look at the manufacturers and the proven models that FS and mortgage leaders are beginning to appreciate.  Remember, collaborators often think of partners or alliances to meet a client demand – one or two players – and not the orchestrated solution sets involving 3, 4, or more with some even being their competitors.

The genius of yesterday must relinquish its models to the reality of tomorrow.  FS and mortgage leaders are faced with new challenges as they are pushed into roles and operations that have little resemblance to 24 month ago certainties.  Stated another way, with changing responsibility and accountability, the practices of management, governance, and operational efficiency must also adapt or die.  For many organizational leaders, they unwittingly have become conductors orchestrating their future – but the score within this credit meltdown is unwritten and they are not accustomed to the new world demands. 

Are we facing a tragic opera or a peaceful symphony?  Time will quickly tell if a “knock-out” blow will be brought forth using Knowledge Orchestration (KO).

Consumer Mining

Tuesday, June 24th, 2008

Stagflation, recession, loss of workforces, commodity hyper-appreciation, and market correction has transformed mortgage end-to-end operational foci from throughput to customer identification and qualification – all within a short 12 months.  Inside every facet of our business models and technological infrastructures, we struggle with were to find and retain profitable consumers.  No individual professional or mortgage operation is immune.  No financial results or staffing ranks unaffected.  Resembling a Greek Tragedy, with a Shakespearian twist, we beat our breasts and lament “Consumer, consumer, where for art though?”  Perhaps they have gone with the nearly 11 million households that possess negative equity, the nearly 11 month supply of homes for sale, or the 8.8% of homes in foreclosure and delinquency?  

So what do we do?  The technical architectures and ideals for todays loosely coupled customer data integration (CDI), MDM, CRM, et al had their genesis back in the early 1990’s as computer scientists began to move beyond transactional processing into multi-system interoperability.  Spurred by noted visionaries (e.g., Shaku Atre, John Zachman) and industry powerhouses (e.g., IBM, Hogan) this fledgling specialization concentrated on house-holding, cross-selling and enterprise data management using internal and third-party data stores. 

Fast-forward nearly two decades and we have begun to deploy new, compartmentalized technological solutions that address fraud, MDM segregation, internet SaaS widgets, n-cube management, collection agents, and complex predictive modeling.  All highly specialized and until recently, not well understood.  For many mortgage operations, these were left to the “geeks” and mathematicians in the backroom to devise.  They were classified as “valuable,” but until recently we were not quite sure why. 

Specialized intelligence (e.g., business, consumer, competitive, and financial) operations have now repeatedly sprang up in those dark corners of our operations.  Surrounded by terabytes of structured and unstructured data elements, these specialized initiatives sought to identify who was “the consumer” and why they “bought” products and services.  Moreover, what is THE algorithm or profiles that definitively lead to customer profitability, successful channel outreach, loan remediation, and growth potential?  The crisis has brought sanity to these arcane discussions and a hope that we can and will achieve a sustainable set of integrated customer mining solutions with both internal and external informational sources.

However, while noted vendors are introducing new solutions to cope and combat changing consumer dynamics (e.g., XSell, The Turning Point), we need to ask ourselves if we have a cohesive consumer architecture that can properly leverage and adapt these various, interconnected solution sets.  This includes not only e-processing but risk mitigation, “cross-holding,” retention, targeting, and on-going consumer behavioral assessment. 

I must ask, are we playing a game of “consumer Whac-a-Mole” with our approach to solve complex customer problems, without understanding the life-cycle and interoperability demands within the existing and future infrastructure?  What about the regulatory, compliance, security, and privacy demands that are shifting fast, driven by negative public ratings surrounding our industry?  How do the pieces fit together to avoid failure and excessive costs?

The use of innovation and innovative methods and techniques permeate the industry’s existing and announced customer and risk management solutions.  We now have meaningful and valuable vendor offerings that work today.  Yet, we have “players in our game” that are trying to target that consumer when and where they resurface – we’re reacting more than predicting. 

This cerebral shift will result in some fundamental organization changes along with internal accountability – marketing, consumer advocacy, master data management, compliance, community affairs, and even the Hope Now Alliance to name but a few.  We must become orchestrators of tech innovation in cooperation with associations, activists, and our vendors.  Our ability to perform multi-dimensional, data integration has advanced considerably.  How are we prepared to utilize it efficiently and competitively?

I have one last rhetorical question.  As we deploy and utilize customer technologies how will they be received by these prospects we so eagerly seek?  As we suffer the worst crisis of confidence since the Great Depression, we need to remember that these solutions can “cut both ways” – intentionally or unintentionally. 

In closing, I would encourage organizations and vendors to comment about your experiences — what has worked, what challenges must be overcome, and what are the on-going governance and oversight needs that to be established for sustainability. 

Orchestrated Innovation – an end to Implement and Abdicate

Monday, June 2nd, 2008

By Mark P. Dangelo

www.Innovative-Relevance.com

Innovation and orchestration are two divergent words that at first glance should not be used together.  The fact-of-the-matter is that the mental images of “orchestration” appear out-of-place when discussing mortgage technologies, processes, and innovations.  Why discuss music at a time when the industry is melting away?  I too remember the stories about Nero and his ambivalent concern for his kingdom.

In times of pervasive and lasting crisis, organizations often seek out new advice and “innovative solutions” in a concerted effort to promote growth, while mitigating downside financial, systemic, and even operational risks (for a superior discussion on orchestration, see Competing in a Flat World by Fung, Fung, and Wind, Wharton School Publishing, 2008). 

Financial services industry leaders today are struggling to deliver an applicable series of innovative solutions that are relevant to our vanishing customers, investors, and of course, market overseers.  However, how will we be able to sustain and adapt these innovative solutions to achieve consistent operating results?  Moreover, if the ideals or solution sets cannot be sustained are we better or worse off than the original baseline six months from now after the check has been cashed?

Taken in their separate silos, innovation and orchestration appear completely divergent.  However, if we combine and leverage their meanings together we arrive at the new market realities facing lenders, servicers, vendors, and outsourcing providers – continuous, active, and accountable facilitation or Orchestrated Innovation. 

The tasks facing the mortgage industry, today and for the foreseeable future, are concentrated around our collective organizational abilities to be integrators of many internal and vendor offerings.  Ask yourself, how you can achieve one of the most common arguments for mortgage innovation and adoption—superior technologies and processes?  Do you achieve it once the contract has been signed?  How about when it goes into production?  What about a year from now?

We all know intuitively and from extensive experience that those firms and individuals who achieve industry recognition must employ numerous multifaceted disciplines to leverage data, remove redundancies, streamline workflows, increase productivity, and yes, lower costs.  They are active facilitators of operational and customer innovations that may reside with vendor products, but nonetheless, have clear base responsibility with the lending or servicing organization.  Even with an outsourced solution set, primary responsibility for transformation and on-going governance must reside with the lender or servicer – not the provider.

Therefore, if we were to resume the old line thought processes of ”implement and abdicate” to our vendors, we may find ourselves facing a new set of challenges underneath the same old technology wrapper.  With the grudging acceptance of the “e” within our streamlined processes and data flows, the need for integration and on-going adaptation has never been greater.  Combined with rising regulatory oversight and compliance reporting (some of which may resemble SOX), the technology and process challenges must be become the active role and accountability of an internal individual or team.  Too often these responsibilities are poorly addressed or more frequently, disregarded in our rush to move onto the next initiative or implementation challenge.

Nostalgically, you might ask, was this not the charge of the CIO, CTO or even the CSO?  The simple answer is yes, but it was nearly 20 years ago when these roles were envisioned within the corporate hierarchy.  There was a great variation in consistencies and results varied widely when our solution sets were less complex and mono-faceted.  In addition, orchestrated innovation was not achieved with the singular implementation of a packaged solution (i.e., killer application) as many corporate boards had come to believe. 

Therefore, with increasingly specialized offerings and complex integration demands, not to mention legal challenges, active and accountable innovative facilitation (i.e., orchestrated innovation) must become part of the corporate culture and delivery structure.  It cannot be outsourced – it cannot be ignored. 

Orchestrated innovation — continuous, active, and accountable facilitation and integration — is here, today, now.  The mortgage industry can no longer hope for a quick recovery – 4.55m unsold homes, U.S. home equity the lowest since 1945, pending Draconian regulations, and home valuation declines exceeding 25% in a year.  With an industry in permanent transition, isn’t it time we internalize and embrace the accountability demand for a new approach and improved organizational role?